10 Best Proposify Alternatives for Your Business

Proposify works fine when your team only sends a handful of proposals each month. But when deal volume picks up, the cracks show. A clunky editor that fights your formatting. Per-user pricing that balloons past $650 a month. And zero support once a proposal turns into a contract.

The pattern shows up across G2 as well. Proposify holds a 4.6/5 rating based on 900+ reviews, but recurring complaints about the drag-and-drop editor, rigid pricing, and missing contract management features reveal where the tool falls short.

That is exactly why teams start searching for Proposify alternatives. Some need a cleaner proposal tool at a better price. Others have outgrown proposals entirely and need full contract lifecycle management.

The best Proposify alternatives are PandaDoc, Zoho Contracts, HyperStart CLM, Qwilr, GetAccept, DealHub, DocuSign, Oneflow, Bidsketch, and Conga. Each one fills a different gap depending on where your team sits today.

 That is exactly why teams start searching for Proposify alternatives

What does Proposify do well?

The drag-and-drop editor makes it easy for sales reps to build on-brand proposals without design help. The template library gives teams a head start, and locked sections prevent reps from editing pricing or legal terms they should not touch.

Real-time engagement tracking shows exactly when a prospect opens a proposal and how long they spend on each section. That kind of visibility helps sales teams time their follow-ups instead of guessing.

Built-in e-signatures keep the signing process inside the platform. CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive pull deal data directly into proposals. Proposify claims customers hit close rates 2x the industry average, with average proposal creation under 17 minutes.

For small teams sending a moderate number of proposals each month, Proposify handles the job. The problems start when teams scale, need contract management beyond proposals, or hit the pricing wall.

Why teams look for Proposify alternatives

Most teams start looking for a replacement after hitting the same friction points.

The editor frustrates more than it helps. G2 reviewers consistently mention formatting issues with tables, images, and text alignment. One user wrote, “The document editor can be a bit tricky to work with. Changing templates isn’t always straightforward, and we’ve run into problems with edits not saving properly.” Per-user pricing adds up fast. The Business plan starts at $3,900/year.

No contract lifecycle management. Proposify handles proposals, not contracts. Once a prospect signs, you are on your own for contract creation, version tracking, approval workflows, and renewals.

Limited approval workflows. Complex deals that need legal review or multi-level sign-off hit bottlenecks.

Poor mobile experience. Reviewing and approving proposals on mobile devices remains a known weak point.

The 10-document cap on the basic plan means most teams cannot even trial the platform properly before committing to a higher tier.

How do the top Proposify alternatives compare?

1. PandaDoc

Best for: Teams that want proposals, quotes, contracts, and e-signatures in a single platform

G2 rating: 4.7/5

Unlike Proposify, PandaDoc offers a genuinely free e-signature plan. The paid plans start at $19 per user per month, significantly cheaper than Proposify’s $49 entry point. The template library includes 750+ pre-built templates. The drag-and-drop editor is smoother than Proposify’s.

Where PandaDoc really separates itself is in-document payments. You can embed payment collection directly into proposals, which shortens the sales cycle. CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive work out of the box.

Key features of PandaDoc

1. Free e-signature plan with unlimited documents
2. 750+ customizable templates for proposals, contracts, and quotes
3. In-document payment collection (Stripe, PayPal, Square)
4. Real-time document analytics and tracking
5. Native CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive
6. Approval workflows with role-based permissions
7. Content library for reusable blocks and clauses

How PandaDoc compares to Proposify

PandaDoc solves nearly every Proposify complaint head-on. The editor is smoother, and formatting issues are far less frequent. Pricing starts at $19 per user per month (vs. Proposify’s $49 entry), there is a genuinely free eSign tier (Proposify has none), and approval workflows handle multi-step routing better than Proposify’s lighter setup.

But it does not solve the mobile gap. G2 reviewers consistently flag PandaDoc’s mobile app as slow and frustrating for editing. PandaDoc is also still pre-signature only. Once the proposal becomes a signed contract, you are back to spreadsheets for tracking and renewals.

PandaDoc fits sales teams that want a stronger editor and unified proposal-to-eSign workflow at a fair price. For teams that need post-signature contract management, HyperStart picks up where PandaDoc stops. See our HyperStart vs PandaDoc comparison.

Pricing of PandaDoc

PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan with unlimited e-signatures. The Essentials plan costs $19 per user per month (billed annually). The Business plan is $49 per user per month. Enterprise pricing is custom.

2. Zoho Contracts

Best for: Teams that want affordable contract lifecycle management inside the Zoho ecosystem

G2 rating: 4.4/5

Zoho Contracts covers the full contract lifecycle from template creation and drafting through negotiation, e-signatures, obligation tracking, and renewals. The platform includes a native word processor, pre-approved clause library, and automated approval workflows.

Where Zoho Contracts stands out is in pricing and accessibility. A free plan supports 3 users with 10 contracts. Paid plans include Zoho Sign at no extra cost, Zoho CRM integration, and unlimited contracts on higher tiers. For teams already using Zoho CRM, the integration bridges sales and legal without a third-party connector.

The Professional plan adds obligation management and unlimited counterparties. The Premium plan includes intake forms and ChatGPT integration for AI-driven contract insights.

Key features of Zoho Contracts

1. Full contract lifecycle management from drafting to renewal

2. Native word processor with pre-approved clause library

3. Automated approval workflows with stakeholder routing

4. Built-in e-signatures through Zoho Sign (included free)

5. Obligation tracking with automated renewal alerts

6. Deep Zoho CRM integration for sales-legal alignment

7. 35+ downloadable reports and analytics dashboards

How Zoho Contracts compares to Proposify

Zoho Contracts solves two Proposify gaps at once: post-signature contract management and pricing. The free plan alone gives small teams more contract functionality than Proposify offers at any price tier. Zoho CRM integration pulls deal data into contracts the same way Proposify connects to CRMs for proposals, but extends it through the full lifecycle.

But it does not solve the proposal design problem. Zoho Contracts is a contract management platform, not a proposal builder. There are no interactive pricing tables, no proposal engagement tracking, and no design-focused templates. Teams that need polished proposals will still want PandaDoc or Qwilr for that stage.

Zoho Contracts fits teams already in the Zoho ecosystem that need an affordable CLM with tight CRM integration. For teams that need deeper AI contract review and faster enterprise deployment, HyperStart is the stronger mid-market fit. See our guide to the best contract management software.

Pricing of Zoho Contracts

Zoho Contracts offers a free plan for 3 users with 10 contracts. The Standard, Professional, and Premium plans are available with annual billing. Zoho Sign is included at no extra cost on all plans. 15-day free trial available.

3. HyperStart

Best for: Teams that have outgrown proposal-only tools and need full contract lifecycle management

G2 rating: 4.6/5

HyperStart CLM is not a proposal tool. It is a full contract management software platform for teams that need everything that comes after the deal is agreed upon. HyperStart solves a different problem entirely: creation, AI-powered review, negotiation, electronic signing, obligation tracking, and renewal management.

HyperStart’s AI contract review engine reviews contracts with 94% accuracy, flagging risks, non-standard clauses, and compliance gaps. The platform supports contract automation workflows that eliminate manual handoffs between sales, legal, and finance. Deployment takes 4 weeks. Pricing includes unlimited users.

Key features of HyperStart

1. AI-powered contract review with 94% accuracy — The AI engine scans every contract for risk clauses, non-standard language, and compliance gaps, flagging issues that would take a human reviewer hours to catch manually
2. Full contract lifecycle management from creation to renewal — HyperStart covers every stage in one platform: drafting from templates, redline negotiation, electronic signing, obligation tracking, and automated renewal workflows, eliminating the need to switch between tools
3. Automated obligation and milestone tracking — Every payment term, delivery deadline, and contractual commitment is tracked automatically after signing. The platform sends proactive alerts before key dates, so nothing slips through the post-signature gap
4. Built-in e-signatures with complete audit trails — Legally binding electronic signatures are embedded directly in the platform, with timestamped records of who signed, when, and from where. No third-party eSign tool required
5. Template and clause library for standardized contracts — Pre-approved templates and a curated clause library give legal teams control over contract language while letting sales and procurement teams move faster without going off-script
6. Role-based access controls and multi-level approval workflows — Contracts route automatically to the right stakeholders based on deal type, contract value, or risk level. Access controls ensure sensitive documents stay in the right hands across legal, finance, and operations
7. 4-week deployment with dedicated onboarding support — HyperStart’s implementation team gets teams fully operational in 4 weeks, compared to the 3-to-6-month timelines common with enterprise CLM platforms like Conga or DocuSign CLM
8. Unlimited users with no per-seat pricing — All plans include unlimited users, so legal, finance, procurement, and operations can all access the platform without per-head costs increasing as the team scales

How HyperStart compares to Proposify

HyperStart solves the biggest Proposify gap that no proposal tool can: contract lifecycle management. Once a Proposify proposal is signed, your team has nowhere to track obligations, milestones, or renewals. HyperStart owns the entire post-signature workflow with 94% AI accuracy on metadata extraction, automated obligation tracking, and renewal alerts.

But it does not solve the proposal design problem. HyperStart is not a proposal builder. If your core need is better-looking sales proposals with embedded videos and pricing widgets, you still want PandaDoc or Qwilr for that stage.

HyperStart fits teams that have outgrown proposal-only tools and need full lifecycle CLM for legal, procurement, and operations workflows. Many teams pair HyperStart for contracts with a lightweight proposal tool for sales decks. See our guide to the best contract management software.

Pricing of HyperStart

HyperStart uses custom pricing based on contract volume and feature requirements. All plans include unlimited users.

4. Qwilr

Best for: Teams that want interactive web-based proposals instead of static PDFs

G2 rating: 4.6/5

Instead of sending a PDF attachment, you send a link. The recipient sees a branded, interactive page with embedded videos, dynamic pricing tables, and accept buttons. Buyers can select options, adjust quantities, and see totals update in real time.

Qwilr integrates natively with HubSpot and Salesforce. Deal data flows both ways.

Key features of Qwilr

1. Web-based interactive proposals (no PDF attachments)
2. Dynamic pricing tables with buyer-adjustable options
3. Native HubSpot and Salesforce integrations
4. Embedded video and rich media support
5. E-signature and payment collection built in
6. Engagement analytics showing time spent per section

How Qwilr compares to Proposify

Qwilr solves Proposify’s editor problem in a fundamentally different way: instead of fixing the PDF editor, it skips PDFs entirely. Buyers get an interactive web page with dynamic pricing, embedded video, and accept buttons. Engagement analytics show what each stakeholder actually viewed.

But it does not solve pricing for small teams. At $35 per user per month, Qwilr is more expensive than Proposify on a per-seat basis. The web-only format also does not fit every buyer, and there is no post-signature contract management.

Qwilr fits sales teams that compete on buyer experience and want interactive proposals. For teams that need both stronger proposals and contract management after the signature, pair Qwilr or PandaDoc with HyperStart. See our guide to the best contract management software.

Pricing of Qwilr

Qwilr’s Business plan starts at $35 per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise pricing is custom. 14-day free trial available.

5. GetAccept

Best for: Sales teams that want digital sales rooms with video, live chat, and engagement tracking

G2 rating: 4.6/5

Where Proposify sends a document and waits, GetAccept creates an interactive environment. Sales reps can record personalized videos, chat live with prospects viewing the proposal, and track which sections get the most attention.

Key features of GetAccept

1. Personalized video messaging embedded in proposals
2. Live chat with prospects while they review documents
3. Digital sales rooms for multi-stakeholder deals
4. Engagement scoring and real-time analytics
5. E-signatures with automated reminders
6. CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Microsoft Dynamics

How GetAccept compares to Proposify

GetAccept solves the engagement gap in Proposify by turning a static document into a digital sales room with personalized video, live chat, and stakeholder-level analytics. For high-value B2B deals, that engagement layer drives close-rate gains that Proposify cannot match.

But it does not solve simplicity. The interface has more surface area than most reps need on day one, and onboarding takes longer than Proposify or PandaDoc. There is also no post-signature contract management.

GetAccept fits sales teams that compete on relationships and need video plus engagement tracking on every deal. For teams that also need contract lifecycle management after signature, pair GetAccept with HyperStart. See our guide to the best contract management software.

Pricing of GetAccept

Plans start at $25 per user per month for the Essential tier. The Professional plan is $49 per user per month. Enterprise pricing is custom.

6. DealHub

Best for: Enterprise sales teams with complex quoting needs (CPQ + CLM in one)

G2 rating: 4.7/5

DealHub handles complex pricing configurations, generates quotes, manages contracts, and tracks subscriptions. It is built for sales organizations with non-standard pricing models, bundled products, and multi-year deals. The DealRoom feature creates a shared digital space.

Key features of DealHub

1. CPQ engine for complex pricing configurations
2. Contract lifecycle management with version control
3. Digital DealRoom for buyer-seller collaboration
4. Subscription management and billing automation
5. Native Salesforce, HubSpot, and Microsoft Dynamics integrations
6. Revenue intelligence and deal analytics

How DealHub compares to Proposify

DealHub solves the gap Proposify cannot touch: complex CPQ. If your proposals involve configurable pricing, multi-product bundles, or multi-year subscriptions, DealHub handles all of that in one workflow plus contract lifecycle management.

But it does not solve accessibility. Pricing is custom only, implementation is long, and the platform is overkill for sales teams sending standard service proposals. Setup requires dedicated resources that Proposify users may not have planned for.

DealHub fits enterprise sales teams with genuine quote complexity and budget for a unified quote-to-revenue platform. For mid-market teams that want CLM without enterprise overhead, HyperStart is the lighter, faster fit. For more, see our guide to Conga competitors, which covers similar enterprise CPQ + CLM territory.

Pricing of DealHub

DealHub uses custom pricing based on modules and user count. Contact their sales team.

7. DocuSign

Best for: Teams where e-signatures are the primary need

G2 rating: 4.5/5

Most people know DocuSign as an e-signature tool, but the platform has expanded. The CLM add-on covers contract creation, negotiation, workflow automation, and reporting. The trade-off is that DocuSign’s proposal creation features are minimal.

Key features of DocuSign

1. Industry-leading e-signature platform trusted by millions
2. Optional CLM module for contract lifecycle management
3. Advanced authentication and identity verification
4. Pre-built integrations with 400+ business applications
5. Mobile-friendly signing experience
6. Compliance with global e-signature regulations (ESIGN, eIDAS, UETA)

How DocuSign compares to Proposify

DocuSign solves the trust and signing portion of Proposify cleanly. For deals where signers expect DocuSign’s name on the signature page, that brand recognition removes the friction that Proposify’s native eSign cannot match. The optional CLM module also adds post-signature management, which Proposify lacks.

But it does not solve the proposal creation problem. There are no design-focused templates, no interactive pricing tables, no embedded video. As a Proposify replacement on the proposal stage itself, DocuSign is a downgrade.

DocuSign fits teams where eSignature trust is the primary driver and proposal design is secondary. For unified proposal-to-contract workflows, pair a proposal tool with HyperStart for full lifecycle CLM. See our guide to DocuSign alternatives.

Pricing of DocuSign

The Personal plan starts at $10 per month (1 user). The Standard plan is $25 per user per month. The Business Pro plan is $40 per user per month. CLM pricing is custom.

8. Oneflow

Best for: Teams that want a true end-to-end contract platform with real-time editing

G2 rating: 4.4/5

The standout feature is real-time editing. Both parties can edit the same contract simultaneously. Oneflow covers the full contract journey: templates, negotiation, signatures, obligations, and renewals through a built-in contract reminder workflow.

Key features of Oneflow

1. Real-time collaborative contract editing
2. Template library with reusable clause blocks
3. Built-in e-signatures with audit trails
4. Contract analytics and performance dashboards
5. Automated reminders for renewals and deadlines
6. Integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Microsoft 365

How Oneflow compares to Proposify

Oneflow solves the bigger gap behind Proposify: it covers the full contract journey, not just the proposal. Real-time collaborative editing eliminates the PDF email chain Proposify forces, and built-in renewal and obligation tracking handles what Proposify drops at the signature.

But it does not solve every editor’s frustration. Complex formatting still requires workarounds in some cases, and annual billing only is less flexible than Proposify’s monthly tiers. Per-user pricing also stacks at the enterprise tier ($54/user/month).

Oneflow fits teams that want a unified proposal-to-contract platform without choosing two separate tools. For deeper AI accuracy and faster mid-market deployment, HyperStart is the stronger CLM-first fit. See our guide to the best contract management software.

Pricing of Oneflow

The Starter plan begins at $20 per user per month. The Business plan is $45 per user per month. The Enterprise plan is $54 per user per month. Annual billing required.

9. Bidsketch

Best for: Solo consultants and freelancers who need simple, affordable proposals

G2 rating: 3.6/5

Bidsketch offers a straightforward proposal builder with reusable sections, basic analytics, and e-signatures. The value proposition is simplicity.

Key features of Bidsketch

1. Reusable proposal sections and fee tables
2. Basic e-signature functionality
3. Proposal analytics (opens, views, time spent)
4. Client-facing proposal pages
5. Simple drag-and-drop editor

How Bidsketch compares to Proposify

Bidsketch solves Proposify’s pricing complaint at the lowest end. At $15 per month for solo users, it is dramatically cheaper than Proposify’s $49/user entry point, and it gets the basic proposal-and-eSign job done.

But it does not solve much else. The interface is dated, CRM integrations are minimal, product updates are infrequent, and there is no contract management after the signature. Anyone past 5-10 proposals per month or with team collaboration needs will outgrow it quickly.

Bidsketch fits solo consultants and freelancers who send a small number of standard proposals per month. For teams of any size, PandaDoc, Zoho Contracts, or HyperStart all serve better. See our guide to the best contract management software.

Pricing of Bidsketch

The Solo plan costs $15 per month. The Team plan is $29 per month per user. The Business plan is $149 per month for unlimited users.

10. Conga

Best for: Salesforce-heavy organizations that need enterprise-scale document generation and CLM

G2 rating: 4.3/5

Conga is an enterprise CLM and document automation platform built natively on Salesforce. The Salesforce-native architecture means contracts, documents, and workflows live inside Salesforce. There is no data syncing or integration layer to maintain.

Key features of Conga

1. Salesforce-native contract and document management
2. Automated document generation from Salesforce data
3. Full contract lifecycle management with approval workflows
4. E-signature integration (DocuSign, Adobe Sign)
5. Revenue lifecycle management and analytics
6. AI-powered contract analysis and risk assessment
7. Compliance tracking and obligation management

How Conga compares to Proposify

Conga solves the post-signature gap Proposify ignores entirely, especially for Salesforce-heavy teams. Document generation pulls directly from Salesforce data, contracts live inside the Salesforce ecosystem, and the full lifecycle (creation, approvals, eSignature, obligations) is covered.

But it does not solve the cost or simplicity. Pricing starts at ~$30K/year and climbs past $100K with modules. Implementation takes months, and Conga effectively requires a dedicated admin to maintain. For Proposify users who valued lightweight self-service, the jump is significant.

Conga fits Salesforce-native enterprises with the budget and admin bandwidth to operate it. For mid-market teams that want CLM without a dedicated admin or Salesforce lock-in, HyperStart deploys in 4 weeks and includes unlimited users. See our guide to Conga competitors.

Pricing of Conga

Conga uses enterprise pricing that typically ranges from $30,000 to $100,000+ per year, depending on modules, user count, and contract volume.

Proposal software vs contract management: when to make the switch

Proposal software handles the front end of the deal. Proposify, PandaDoc, Zoho Contracts, and Qwilr all live in this space. Contract management (CLM) platforms handle everything that comes after the handshake: contract creation, contract negotiation with redlining, compliance tracking, obligation management, and renewal workflows.

When your team starts losing track of signed contracts, missing renewal deadlines, or spending hours searching for clauses, you have outgrown proposal software. The CLM market is projected to reach $5.65 billion by 2030 (Grand View Research).

CLM platforms like HyperStart handle contract lifecycle management from end to end.

How to choose the right Proposify alternative

1. Define your actual need. Are you looking for a better proposal editor, or have you outgrown proposal tools entirely?
2. Evaluate pricing models carefully. Per-user pricing adds up fast. Calculate the total cost at 10, 25, and 50 users.
3. Check integration depth. Surface-level CRM integrations are common. Deep integrations that push contract data back into your CRM are rare.
4. Test the editor with your actual documents. Import your most complex proposal and see if formatting holds.
5. Assess post-signature capabilities. If you need contract signing software that handles post-signature workflows, verify tracking, compliance, and renewals.
6. Consider deployment time. Enterprise CLM platforms take 3 to 6 months. HyperStart deploys in 4 weeks.

Choosing the right platform after moving beyond Proposify

If you’re moving away from Proposify, the next step is to be clear about what problem you’re actually solving – not every team needs the same type of replacement.

Start by identifying where Proposify is falling short. If your challenge is better proposal design, smoother editing, or pricing flexibility, tools like PandaDoc or Qwilr are natural upgrades. They improve the proposal experience without changing your workflow too much.

But if your challenges start after the deal is signed, missed renewals, lack of visibility into contracts, or manual tracking, then switching to another proposal tool will not fix the problem. This is where you need to shift from proposal software to full contract lifecycle management.

Once your priorities are clear, shortlist tools based on that need. Proposal-focused tools help you close deals faster. CLM platforms help you manage everything after the deal is closed. Trying to force one tool to do both usually leads to gaps.

Before making a decision, test how each platform fits into your real workflow. Import your templates, check approval flows, and involve stakeholders across sales, legal, and operations. The right choice is not the one with the most features, it is the one your team can actually adopt and rely on as deal volume grows.